I think you're the third person to ask on this page. Since puzzle pieces are considered dead, these would come in the form of FLEX 45 curves. It's a whole ton of coding, so nobody really wants to open that can of worms, but it is a logical step eventually. A model-savvy member will have to decide to dive into it. Maybe if enough people keep lobbying for it.



are

May I clarify before departing for the laundromat...?1. Puzzle piecesdead. Or at least they will be for RHWdev continuing on from here.2. Theoretically, there could just be a singular (or many?) master FlexCurves whose base is the L0 RHW-2 network, and can be overrideable to fit other RHW curves, such as MIS, RHW-3, and RHW-4. I'm excluding RHW-6S because it was given unique geometry that's still locked as a puzzle piece (and what's worse, it was decided before anyone else can plan out Flexing any of the curves). HOWEVER, it won't be like the FlexFly where you can just run networks above or below; its flex properties are only limited to overriding to form other single-tile RHW curves excluding 6S. Therefore, there'd have to be a MAJOR distinction and renaming between a FlexFly and a FlexCurve:FlexFlys are curve-like structures that allow networks of differing height levels to fly over OR under, hence the fly in the name. These pieces are NOT slope-tolerant. The width and height levels of these pieces are typically locked in by unique anchor tiles. This means the L0 FlexCurve needs to be an L0 FlexFly, as odd as that sounds, even though elevated networks would still fly over it, while its elevated sisters can fly above ground networks.Unless a better name come along, FlexCurves are curve-like structures that DO NOT allow other networks to fly over or under it. They are flexible in the sense that they can override according to height and width, to an extent. These pieces are layed out typically by INRUL code, and would be more slope-tolerant than its cousins, the FlexFlys.That's all I can say right now.