Skip to comments.

Media Have a Cry Wolf Problem with Trump

National Review ^ | 7/27/16 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on by randita

Media Have a Cry Wolf Problem with Trump

Decades of smearing decent Republican candidates leaves them without credibility on Trumps demagoguery.

By Jonah Goldberg  July 27, 2016

Dear Mainstream Media and Democrats: Its your turn. Now that Donald Trump has been formally nominated, the formal responsibility to stop him passes from the Right to the Left, from Republicans to Democrats and the journalists who amplify their values.

Youre going to find it a very tough slog. And its your own damn fault.

During the primaries, the task of exposing the true nature of the Trump takeover fell disproportionately to a few conservative magazines, columnists, renegade radio hosts, and behind-the-scenes activists. We all failed. There will be plenty of time for recriminations and we happy few speeches later. (If you detect a note of bitterness on my part, Im not being clear enough: I contain symphonies of bitterness.)

We failed in part because the mainstream media were having too good of a time to help. Last spring, Stop Trump operatives told me they brought damning stories to mainstream outlets. The response was usually: Were not interested in covering that  right now.

By May, Trump had already received roughly $3 billion worth of free media, thanks to ratings-hungry TV networks. CBS chief Les Moonves summarized it well at an investor conference in February: Trumps rise may not be good for America, but its damn good for CBS.

Many in the media were so willing to put clicks and ratings before country because the conventional wisdom was that Trump would fade or implode eventually. Why not gawk at the spectacle? And if Trump did get the nomination, many journalists calculated, all the better. What fun it will be to watch Hillary Clinton destroy Trump and Trump destroy the GOP.

Only slowly have the media come around to the realization that Trump is an actual threat, but now it may be too late because they have a serious cry wolf problem. Millions of Americans firmly believe that journalists are water carriers for the Democrats and will tune out much of what they have to say about Trump now that hes the nominee.

You can start the timeline as far back as the World War II era. In 1944, Franklin Roosevelt told the country that if Republicans were returned to power, even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of fascism here at home. The press nodded along.

In 1964, CBS Newss Daniel Schorr claimed that Barry Goldwaters planned post-convention vacation in Europe was really an effort to coordinate with right-wing Germans in Hitlers one-time stomping ground.

In recent years, as the distinctions between news and opinion, analysis and advocacy, reporting and click-baiting has blurred, the problem has only gotten worse.

Every election cycle, the GOP nominee is smeared as a racist by the Democrats or the press  or both. Representative John Lewis of Georgia trades in a bit more of his hard-earned moral authority each time he insinuates that the GOP nominee is like George Wallace or wants to bring back Jim Crow, and political columnists relinquish a bit more of their claim to objectivity each time they let his comments pass without condemnation or criticism.

George W. Bush revived for the Left the paranoid style in American politics, and if you google John McCain, racist, 2008 youll see he was lazily demonized too.

In 2012, pundits said Paul Ryan wanted to throw old ladies over cliffs because he wanted to reform Social Security. When Mitt Romney spoke to the NAACP, the response from many in the media was, per usual, Racist! (Its ironic that many of the notable Republicans rebuking Trump this year are the ones pundits were only too happy to paint as racist not long ago.)

I have no doubt many journalists would defend their smears and professional failures, but that doesnt change the fact that many Americans outside the mainstream media/Democratic bubble find it all indefensible. More important, they find it all ignorable  because the race card and the demagogue card have been played and replayed so often theyre little more than scraps of lint.

Already, editorial boards are preparing their indictments of what they believe to be Donald Trumps incompetence, bigotry, and authoritarianism. Trump operatives will undoubtedly respond: Thats what they always say about Republicans. And theyll be right.

 Jonah Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review.



TOPICS:

Crime/Corruption

Government

News/Current Events

Politics/Elections

KEYWORDS:

2016dncconvention

clinton

hohum

jonahgoldberg

liberalmedia

media

msm

trump

yawn

yellowjournalism





To: randita

Alas, Jonah, we must part ways. I’ve enjoyed your columns for 15 years. I can no longer read what you write.



by 2 posted onby dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)

To: randita

Get over yourself, Jonah. You, in your own way, were just as bad as the MSM you decry.



To: randita

Has Jonah endorsed Hillary? What does he suggest a voter DO in November? I ask the question seriously.



To: randita

Well, you may as well swallow a bottle of aspirin then, Joanie.



To: randita





How did he become one of the leaders of NR, let alone a popular conservative commentator? He’s outright lying by claiming the media wasn’t tough on Trump.



To: randita

Goldberg and Shapiro on 2 successive clicks. Not a good morning. New show-Abysmally stupid and abysmally stupider.



To: randita

Goldberg used to be a favored writer of mine. He has lost his mind to his hatred of Trump (for some reason). Bye, Jonah.



by 9 posted onby Afterguard (Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long .as it's mandatory.)

To: randita; WildHighlander57; Conservative Gato; Psalm 144; onyx; Jane Long; PA Engineer; ...





Had Jonah Goldberg not been riding his Mommy's coat tails from Lucianne.Com, he would still be delivering the morning newspaper to his neighbors, which is honestly the highest station in life his skills would have taken him.



His writing abilities are slow, plodding, and beg the reader to just flip to the end of the book or article and be done with it. No redeeming literary value whatsoever.



Jonah? That 'thump thump' sound you hear will be the *TRUMP RAIN* running over your mealy mouthed ass.





"Trumps demagoguery."Had Jonah Goldberg not been riding his Mommy's coat tails from Lucianne.Com, he would still be delivering the morning newspaper to his neighbors, which is honestly the highest station in life his skills would have taken him.His writing abilities are slow, plodding, and beg the reader to just flip to the end of the book or article and be done with it. No redeeming literary value whatsoever.Jonah? That 'thump thump' sound you hear will be therunning over your mealy mouthed ass.

by 10 posted onby mkjessup (Want a Third Term for Obama? Vote in Hillary Rotten Criminal & her socialist fatso, Tim Kaine!!)

To: mkjessup

*TRUMP TRAIN* (although the Trump RAIN will hopefully drown your ass too! lol)



by 11 posted onby mkjessup (Want a Third Term for Obama? Vote in Hillary Rotten Criminal & her socialist fatso, Tim Kaine!!)

To: randita

My jaw is dropped who is this writing? Shucks another one bites the dust..... GO TRUMP



by 12 posted onby Uversabound (Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)

To: TakebackGOP

Where did Goldberg say the media wasn’t tough on Trump?



To: randita

“firmly believe that journalists are water carriers for the Democrats” What does he mean? No Jonah. Many people KNOW about journalists. Ok. These people are going to try to say, for the next eight years, that the people running the country are delusional? Good Luck with that. Talk about sitting back and watching the sh show



To: randita

By May, Trump had already received roughly $3 billion worth of free media, thanks to ratings-hungry TV networks. False. He got free media coverage because he agreed to be interviewed and wasn't afraid of the grilling. The rest cowered in fear of being in front of the camera.



by 15 posted onby CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)

To: randita

Wow. Pearl clutching vapors much? That was really pitiful.



To: randita

Ah just shut up Jonah



by 17 posted onby Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)

This may be on a different subject but the last time I tried to visit National Review Online I encountered a problem with trying to access one of their articles. The site wanted me to either disable my ad blocker or "whitelist" it in order to continue. I ended up unfollowing and unliking them on Facebook as a result. Some things are more important than money like the health and well being of my computer.



To: randita

Jonah Who?



by 19 posted onby Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)

To: randita

Is he going to keep writing about his butthurt for the rest of his life?



by 20 posted onby zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson