I understand from years of reading, documentaries and input from various academic minds many things we are taught to believe are the accepted mainstream science theories for the moment. But as scientists discover more, find clear evidence that differs from mainstream beliefs, our views can change. It should change. It is growth to change.

Well I watched this video documentary which is really well made and it is very interesting in that there is so much suppressed evidence that differ from mainstream science theories of today. The origin of humans, Darwin could have been wrong, Antarctica being a thriving place to live once long ago, human culture is not 4,500 years but it could be 12,000 years ago, etc are compelling subjects dealt with here. I find it extremely fascinating many scientists would ‘suppress’ the truth that new evidence show counter to mainstream ideas.

What is the big deal if newer evidence usurps older views that may advance our knowledge. Who loses? No one in the end. Wrong theories is subjective to evidence found at a particular time, but advancement is as better word to use when we find new theories that counter outdated ones. Why don’t we advance with knowledge instead being stuck with a view we find ‘comfortable’ with? Please watch this video and share with me what stuck out for you.

I quote from the description of this video:

“The creators of the Emmy Award Winning Mystery of the Sphinx present a revolutionary new film that examines one of our greatest mysteries: Man’s origins. Hosted by Charlton Heston, this film challenges what we are being taught about human evolution and the rise of early civilization. A new breed of scientific investigators present startling evidence that the academic community has quietly ignored. “

Why do you think scientists ignore newer facts that state differently than accepted mainstream norms?

Why would some be afraid of updating knowledge that can broaden our minds and understanding of ourselves?

Is the truth something so frightening that to live in inaccuracies is better?

Tsem Rinpoche





Or view the video on the server at:

https://video.tsemtulku.com/videos/ForbiddenArcheology_SecretDiscoveriesofEarlyMan.mp4

This video on THE MYSTERY OF THE SPHINX further supports that dating of many archaelogical sites are much older supporting the other video on this post’s theory. Sphinx and pyramids are traditionally believed to be known as 4,000 years old or so. But in fact much older according to startlingly obvious evidence recently uncovered. In fact double the age or more. That would mean the accepted view on the age of human civilization is much older. Many books have to be re-written. Many accepted scientific view would have to change.

Please watch carefully:

Or view the video on the server at:

https://video.tsemtulku.com/videos/TheMysteryOfTheSphinx.mp4

Note: All articles published on the blog are conceptualised, approved and edited by H.E. the 25th Tsem Rinpoche. For further assistance and any urgent enquiries, please write in to mail@tsemladrang.com.



Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 13 of the Malaysian Copyright Act 1987, allowance is made for “fair dealing” for purposes such as non-profit research, private study, criticism, review or the reporting of current events. The Operator and author(s) of TsemRinpoche.com, a not-for-profit blog, do not claim ownership on the intellectual property rights of the contents, images and/or videos reproduced in this article. Any subsisting intellectual property rights shall belong to the legal owner of the contents, images and/or videos.