The Sept. 1-2 visit to Beirut by Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein-Amir Abdollahian was not a mere formality en route to Damascus. Rather, during it, he conveyed several messages to Lebanon, the region and the world. Abdollahian met with a number of Lebanese officials, including Prime Minister Tammam Salam, parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Foreign Affairs Minister Gebran Bassil in addition to Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah. The Iranian deputy minister also met with Sigrid Kaag, the UN special coordinator in Lebanon, and Staffan de Mistura, the UN special envoy for Syria.

Sources close to some of the Lebanese officials who met with Abdollahian told Al-Monitor that he went out of his way to reassure them about the consistency of Iranian positions vis-a-vis regional issues in the wake of Tehran's nuclear deal with the six world powers. In discussing the domestic situation in Lebanon, he said the main concern is obviously the presidential vacuum and electing a new president amid fears of foreign, including UN, intervention. On Sept. 2, during Abdollahian's visit, the UN Security Council issued a statement calling on Lebanon to elect a president in the near future.

Those who met with Abdollahian said he insisted that the presidential elections be left in the hands of the Lebanese people without foreign intervention, including from Iran, or pressure on any Lebanese party. A Lebanese official who attended the meetings and spoke on condition of anonymity said that Abdollahian was clear in stating European officials had brought up the presidential elections with Tehran, and that some of them who had recently visited Iran had tried to suggest a deal. The Europeans apparently put forward pressuring Hezbollah on the issue in return for foreign and European promises on other matters, which Abdollahian did not specify. Tehran was firm, however, in ruling out such a possibility, asserting that it has left Lebanese affairs in general, and the presidency in particular, to Hezbollah’s better judgment, under the direct guidance of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. No party can cross these lines.

Regarding Syria, the same official revealed that Abdollahian suggested Iran’s current initiative on the Syrian crisis is almost in joint step with Moscow and even Washington. The Iranians alluded that, during talks between Moscow and Riyadh and most probably with Washington as well, Russia had been hesitant on the issue of putting its full weight behind Syrian President Bashar al-Assad staying in power and leading any settlement to the Syrian crisis. Recently, however, Moscow made a firm decision to support Assad remaining in power. This allowed for greater coordination among Russian and Iranian diplomats on the Syrian situation. Although Abdollahian did not say so, the Lebanese official told Al-Monitor that, most likely, due to the Saudi negotiations with Russia in past months — especially after Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to Moscow on June 18 — the Russian stance vis-a-vis Assad’s staying or departing had been vague or unresolved.

The subsequent failure of the Moscow-Riyadh talks, which was obvious during an Aug. 11 visit by Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir to Russia to meet with his counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, allowed the Russian leadership to settle its position on the Syrian issue. This was conveyed in statements by Lavrov as well as by Russian President Vladimir Putin, both of whom reiterated Assad’s legitimacy and his remaining in power. This is what led to more coordination between the Russian and Iranian stances, according to the Lebanese official.

The same official added Abdollahian clearly asserted that his country’s initiative, regardless of the details or practical suggestions, will not make any concessions in regard to a road map keeping Assad as president. Assad would also handle the formation of a national unity government, which would include opposition figures, to achieve agreed-upon political and constitutional reforms before holding general parliamentary elections.

The Lebanese official said that de Mistura came to Beirut specifically to meet with Abdollahian at the Iranian Embassy. The meeting was to discuss Iran’s thinking on the war in Syria and ways to coordinate de Mistura’s ideas and Tehran's. De Mistura’s step clearly indicates UN engagement with Iran's ideas, as those concerned at the UN know that Moscow and perhaps Washington support Tehran’s moves as well.

The Lebanese official believes this is probably accurate. When Abdollahian was asked repeatedly about the nuclear agreement and the possibility that the United States would accept it, he would smile and assert that this was a resolved issue, beyond the shadow of a doubt. Tehran is now basing its considerations and regional moves on this eventuality.

The other issue Abdollahian tackled during his visit was the deterioration of the Saudi-Iranian relationship. According to a Lebanese official, Abdollahian said the Saudis seem worried, hesitant and lost. He expected them to try to reach a deal with Washington whereby they would accept the nuclear agreement in return for playing a larger role in Middle Eastern affairs. According to Abdollahian’s insinuations, however, such a deal is out of the question. The US administration does not need Saudi Arabia to secure the agreement with Iran, nor is Saudi Arabia capable of playing a positive role in any regard, given its current turmoil. Abdollahian seemed certain that things are looking up on all issues, despite Saudi Arabia’s disposition.