In the real world of electoral politics, Hillary Clinton wins only if she gets the most votes. But according to the new breed of clickbait headlines that proliferate on Facebook, an oration that’s rousing enough, or a tweet that’s snarky enough, can singlehandedly vaporize the Republican nominee.

“Obama Just Annihilated Donald Trump with the Whole World Watching at DNC,” the website PoliticusUSA declared during last week’s Democratic National Convention. After first lady Michelle Obama’s well-received speech, a Vanity Fair headline gushed, “How FLOTUS Defeated Donald Trump without Mentioning His Name.” After the GOP candidate criticized the parents of a Muslim US Army captain who died in Iraq — and sparked a social-media backlash — The Root reported that “Twitter Destroys Donald Trump with #TrumpSacrifices.”

These articles never live up to their billing. Somehow, despite being annihilated, destroyed, and defeated, Trump is still campaigning and has a genuine shot at winning.

Advertisement

Memo to dedicated partisans: You’re not helping your cause by sharing wishful-thinking clickbait. Facebook’s “news feed” is a misnomer; these stories are fantasies, built on the hope that politicians you dislike will shrink away because of how emphatically someone denounced them. The headlines provide vindication that real life never does.

Get Today in Opinion in your inbox: Globe Opinion's must-reads, delivered to you every Sunday-Friday. Sign Up Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Blame Facebook for rewarding political escapism. The social network’s algorithm shows people material that affirms their ideological instincts rather than challenging them.

Recently, The Wall Street Journal built a useful tool called “Blue Feed, Red Feed.” In its liberal version of Facebook, the GOP nominee has been vanquished a hundred times over. Meanwhile, the conservative version features “stories” with headlines such as “Trump Just Put the FEAR in Hillary with 5 Simple Words She Won’t Soon Forget.” The five words, according to the Conservative Tribune, were “I’m taking the gloves off.” As for that FEAR? It’s unclear that Clinton even knew of the statement.

A few election cycles ago, before the Facebook era began in earnest, liberals who were in denial about George W. Bush could buy t-shirts that said “Bartlet is my president.” This was funny but also pitiful. Jed Bartlet, of course, was the fictitious commander in chief on “The West Wing.” Democrats had a TV show, while Republicans had the White House.

Living in an alternate political reality is even easier now, because Facebook has changed the way millions of Americans consume news. Sometimes, the company uses its power for good: A couple of years ago, you couldn’t escape garbage stories with breathless “curiosity gap” headlines — “I Never Thought A Slice of Pie Would Make Me So Angry” — until Facebook tweaked its algorithm to banish them. Goodbye, Upworthy!

Advertisement

But if Facebook regrets the way it’s polarized the political dialogue in America, the company isn’t showing it. If anything, the most recent algorithm tweak will make the social network even more of an echo chamber. Which means that, in November, one part or another of the political spectrum is in for a rude surprise — a new president who, according to Facebook headlines, has already been scared off or annihilated.

Dante Ramos can be reached at dante.ramos@globe.com . Follow him on Facebook: facebook.com/danteramos or on Twitter: @danteramos