Reposted from Gongchao, 9 October 2017.

Also see this music video made by the temp workers in Changchun.



—

FAW-VW workers employed through temporary agencies in Changchun, northeastern China, have been involved in a struggle for equal pay since late 2016. FAW-VW was established in 1991 as a joint venture co-owned by the Chinese state enterprise FAW and German car makers Volkswagen (VW) and Audi. Apart from Changchun (Jilin), it runs factories in Chengdu (Sichuan), Dalian (Liaoning) and Foshan (Guangdong). It employs more than 50.000 workers and produces passenger cars and car components.

Struggle of temporary workers at FAW-VW in Changchun

The temporary workers – many of them working at FAW-VW for years – demand that the joint venture hires them as direct employees immediately, that it acknowledges how long they have worked there, and that they get compensated for the past unequal pay. They do the same work but earn roughly half of what workers directly employed by FAW-VW get (for example, 60,000 yuan vs. 120,000 annually) and don’t receive any of the latter’s benefits. In their statements, the temporary workers call this a breach of China’s Labor Contract Law, namely article 63 (equal pay for equal work) and article 66 (agency workers should just fill ‘provisional, auxiliary or substitutive positions’). Besides, some of the temporary agencies are directly linked to (and possibly owned by) FAW-VW, a breach of article 67 of the Labor Contract Law (companies are not permitted to establish their own temporary agencies to employ workers). On top of that, VW has even committed itself to equal pay in the “Charter on Temporary Work for the Volkswagen Group.”

The new regulations for temporary agency work were implemented in China in 2013 as part of amendments to the Labor Contract Law, but with a three-year transitional period that expired in 2016. Temporary workers at FAW-VW were aware of that and acted accordingly. They made their demands through China’s sole official union ACFTU in November 2016, but seven collective bargaining sessions with FAW-VW and temporary agencies failed. When workers filed a case at local courts it was rejected. Several demonstrations between February and May this year did not lead to any solution, either. On May 26, 2017, the workers’ representatives Fu Tianbo, Wang Shuai and Ai Zhenyu were arrested for “gathering crowds to disrupt social order,” a standard accusation used by the CCP regime to quell social unrest. While Wang and Ai were released soon after, Fu was officially charged in early June and has remained in custody since.

Workers supporting Fu have tried to get him out by writing open letters to the authorities, i.e., in August to the local Public Security Bureau (the police administration responsible for Fu’s detention) and in September to the Communist Party’s anti-graft Central Leading Group for Inspection Work. They also wrote letters to the German VW headquarters, the German works council and others to ask for their intervention. On August 25, two heads of VW’s European and global works councils from the German metal workers’ union IG Metall sent a return letter telling the workers in China that they would “take the case very serious” and then asking them to report the case to Volkswagen or the Chinese local authorities. In other words, they ask the temporary workers in China to call on their opponents in the labor dispute and those who arrested their representative for support. The Chinese temporary workers who posted the German works councilors’ reply letter online commented appropriately: “The Germans don’t care. So it’s on us to fight!”

FAW-VW’s apparent breach not only of Chinese labor law but also of VW’s own commitment to equal pay is in line with the general practice in China. Many Chinese and foreign companies openly break the labor law, e.g., by forcing workers to work extended overtime and by paying less than the official minimum wage. Furthermore, VW seems to continue a tradition of collaborating with authoritarian regimes and their repression of social resistance. VW’s collaboration with the Brazilian dictatorship in the 1970s, the passing on of information on the political orientation of workers to the repressive organs and the toleration of subsequent arrests, was a hot topic in German media this summer.

More VW worker mobilizations in Europe

Meanwhile, in Europe VW has had to deal with more worker mobilizations and strikes in recent months. In June, VW workers in Bratislava, Slovakia, won a 14.1 percent wage increase after staging the first strike in that plant since the collapse of socialist rule in 1989.

In early August, after conflicts around VW’s decision to extend weekend work, workers in the VW plant in Poznań, Poland, left the union Solidarity (Solidarność) in protest and established a new self-organized section within the base union Workers’ Initiative (Inicjatywa Pracownicza). After VW sacked several workers involved in this for alleged defamation of the company, 2,000 workers signed a petition for their reinstatement in early September.

At the end of August, VW workers in Palmela, close to Lisbon, Portugal, went on strike – the first company strike in decades – against the extension of weekend work.

And at the end of September, workers of the VW subsidiary Autovision in Emden and Osnabrück, Germany, demanded that VW hires them directly. They had originally worked for VW as temporary workers before they were hired by Autovision, which serves as a kind of subcontractor and dispatches them to the VW plants.

These mobilizations and strikes are a reaction to the discriminating use of temporary work by VW as well as the increasing work pressure in VW factories, and they reflect the demand of workers in ‘peripheral’ countries to close the wage gap in comparison with VW workers in Germany.

Industrial transformation

The worker mobilizations hit VW – which is still partly owned and largely controlled by the German state – in a decisive time. While VW became (again) the biggest global car maker in 2016, the diesel emissions scandal, i.e., the deliberate violation of pollution regulations, and its ripple effects threaten to destabilize and weaken the company. At the same time, the apparent transition to electric cars poses a big challenge as the established factory-based mass production of fuel-run automobiles cannot easily be converted to producing battery-run automobiles. Now, the diesel emissions scandal might accelerate the intended (expensive) transformation of VW, and the workers are supposed to pay the price – at least, that seems to be the management’s plan.

China as the biggest (fuel-run) automobile market and producer globally is a center stage of VW’s transformation. The country stands for 41 percent of VW’s global vehicle sales and 49 percent of its global pre-tax profits, and China is already the leading producer of and market for electric cars in general – though this automobile ‘green leap forward’ is highly subsidized by the Chinese state.

VW as well as Renault-Nissan, Ford, and other global car makers are establishing new joint ventures with Chinese partner companies to start with the mass production of electric cars – the third wave of the establishment of such auto joint ventures after the 1980s and the mid-1990s/mid-2000s. The times have changed, though, with VW and the others facing severe competition from the side of the Chinese auto producers, in a time when these also started to expand globally.

Impact of workers struggles in China

Whether and how the transformation of VW (and other car producers) will work out depends on the development of the auto workers struggles, too. The struggle of the FAW-VW workers in Changchun is the latest example of auto worker’s militancy in China that started in the 1990s and 2000s – including directly employed as well as temporary agency workers – and saw a first peak during the strike wave in 2010.

Meanwhile, the ongoing transformation of the Chinese economy – restructuring, relocation, ‘upgrading’ – is affecting all workers. The flattening of the economic growth rate since the late 2000s was followed by a flattening of the wage increase rate. However, the workers’ expectations are still high as they continue to demand improvements in the face of their still dire working conditions.

After strikes and other struggles were largely successful in raising wages and improving conditions in the 2000s, they have been met with more counterpressure by managements and the state in recent years – a result of the tightening political control and repression of social protests under the CCP leadership around president Xi Jinping since he came to power in 2012–13.

It is against this background, that the temporary agency workers at FAW-VW in Changchun face the joint ignorance and repression by VW, the Chinese state-owned enterprise FAW, the CCP authorities and the police. Their struggle is still going on, more will follow.

Notes

For more information see: http://www.faw-vw.com.