The author of the report, former US federal prosecutor Michael Garcia, has long campaigned for the details to be made public as concerns rocket over allegations of corruption in the two events being staged by Russia and Qatar respectively.

Australia initially led a chorus for a revote after losing out to Qatar for the rights to hold the 2022 FIFA World Cup, declaring that corruption allegations against Qatar were a 'serious development'.

Chairman of the Ethics Committee’s adjudicatory chamber confirms statement will be made public on Thurs 13 Nov at approx. 10am CET (1/2). — FIFA Media (@fifamedia) November 12, 2014

Tomorrow’s statement relates to investigatory chamber’s inquiry on 2018/22 #WorldCup bidding process. It will be published @FIFAcom (2/2). — FIFA Media (@fifamedia) November 12, 2014

In a break with FIFA tradition, the 2018 and 2022 tournaments were awarded at the same time, in 2010, leading to claims of horse-trading in the bidding process.

The 350-page Garcia report was handed to FIFA on 5 September.

It summed up a year-long investigation that involved interviewing more than 75 witnesses and compiling a dossier with more than 200,000 pages and audio interviews.

Several high-profile figures have called for FIFA to publish Garcia's report, including UEFA president Michel Platini and FIFA vice-president Prince Ali Bin Al Hussein.

However, FIFA president Sepp Blatter had argued that the publication of the report would compromise the confidentiality of witnesses.

Only last month, Garcia criticised FIFA's lack of transparency.

"The investigation and adjudication process operates in most parts unseen and unheard," he said.

"That's a kind of system which might be appropriate for an intelligence agency, but not for an ethics compliance process in an international sports institution that serves the public and is the subject of intense public scrutiny.

"Transparency is not intended to embarrass certain individuals by airing dirty laundry or to harm the organisation by showing what went wrong. It's the opposite."