But before Anastasia starts gathering points for its three-dimensional renditions of the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg or its bird's-eye view of Paris, it seems fair to hear some gentle words of misgiving from a few true lovers of Russian history.

For as they see it, ''Anastasia'' goes a step beyond ''Pocahontas.'' It cracks a new level of ahistoricity, using the tragedy of the murdered Russian czarina as little more than back story -- the Revolution is over by the time the opening credits roll -- for the usual cartoon concoction of romance, adventure and the battle between good and evil, complete with the requisite happy ending and a shopping spree at Chanel.

In the new ''Anastasia,'' ''the history is completely wrong, and that is upsetting,'' said Suzanne Massie, author of several books on Russian history and culture, including ''Land of the Firebird.''

''I happen to think it's terribly important to have Russian history represented at least, if you will, spiritually correctly,'' she said, ''because it has been so falsified for so many years. And my experience of 30 years of trying to deal with this is that we are absolutely fraught with stereotypes in the West about Russian history.''

IF ''ANASTASIA'' IS ANY INDICATION of where things are going in the world of historically inspired movies, said Bob Atchison, a Web-page designer and Russian history enthusiast, ''The next thing they're going to do is, 'Anne Frank moves to Orlando and opens a crocodile farm with a guy named Mort.' ''

Those complaining had only seen the movie's trailer and a description of the plot. But that was enough to disturb them.

Repeated exploitation of Anastasia's romantic tale seems inevitable, however, so inevitable that many who might be offended the most -- Romanov descendants -- seem to accept it with equanimity.

Advertisement Continue reading the main story

The new movie ''just used the name and made it into a total fantasy,'' said Marina Beadleston, whose great-uncle was the murdered Czar Nicholas II. ''The thing is, that's fine so long as somewhere a history book and parents correct it to give how it really happened.''

Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you're not a robot by clicking the box. Invalid email address. Please re-enter. You must select a newsletter to subscribe to. Sign Up You will receive emails containing news content , updates and promotions from The New York Times. You may opt-out at any time. You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services. Thank you for subscribing. An error has occurred. Please try again later. View all New York Times newsletters.

She never ceases to be amazed, she added, by ''the romance people feel about the Russian royal family.

''I don't know why it is,'' she said. ''They don't have it about the English royal family or the French. It's about the Russians.''

Which is exactly what 20th Century Fox is banking on with its $53 million film -- that the magic of the Anastasia name and concept will prove as potent as, say, the roar of Disney's ''Lion King.'' ''Anastasia'' is Fox's first attempt to create a cartoon film that like ''Aladdin'' or ''Beauty and the Beast'' is so successful as a movie that it rises above the animated category and is seen simply as a blockbuster.

''We're shooting for all the bananas, all the marbles, all the -- something,'' said Bill Mechanic, chairman of Fox Filmed Entertainment.

Mr. Goldman, the film's co-director and co-producer, acknowledges that ''Anastasia'' uses history only as a starting point: ''It's a fairy tale based on 'What if?' '' he said.

The filmmakers, he added, took the basic facts of the Romanovs' demise and the Russian Revolution and asked, ''What if this girl escaped, and what would have happened to her?''

They decided, he said, that the movie was going to be ''a family thing about a search for your family and strong family values'' as well as ''a self-discovery story, a story that everyone in life goes through.''

Those tempted to interrupt and exclaim ''Anastasia and her family were dead! Dead! She had no self to discover!'' should perhaps be reminded that the true power of the Anastasia myth has always been wishful thinking, the deep desire to undo the unspeakably bloody history of the Russian Revolution -- at least in the person of one princess.

Advertisement Continue reading the main story

So if the cartoon has the young princess (with the voice of Meg Ryan) meeting up with a handsome young con man (John Cusack) who persuades her to pretend to be the lost czarina, not knowing she really is the lost czarina, is it really much more farfetched than the real-life assertions of the best-known pretender, Anna Anderson, that she was Anastasia even though she could not speak Russian?

In response to the coming film, Mr. Atchison, the Web-page designer, has created a not-for-profit Web page (www.pallasweb.com/anastasia) that offers readers the real story of Anastasia, including mention of recent DNA and forensic testing that has solved much of the mystery. The tests, technologically possible only in this decade, established, to the satisfaction of all but the most determined of conspiracy theorists, that her body was among those of her family unearthed in Yekaterinburg and that Anna Anderson was, in fact, a Polish factory worker.

Mr. Atchison and other Russian-history enthusiasts acknowledge a certain trade-off here. ''If 900,000 kids go to 'Anastasia' and of that, 10,000 kids become really interested in Russian history and go on and find the truth and pursue it, it's worth it,'' he said. ''But on the other hand, we create 890,000 people in the United States who are actually going to believe this story is true.''