I do not go to atmospheric scientists to learn about history, nor do I go to historians to learn about atmospheric science. Quigley has no qualifications as a scientist.

Nor does Sutton, another historian.

I get my science from actual scientists who do research in the field.

Calling my refutation of geoengineering theories mockery is a misreprentation of my views. I point out that atmospheric science sees "chemtrails" as myth. Nor do I mock those who buy into the propaganda, but urge them to do their own research by studying a little atmospheric science and then observing in their own area: observe the altitude (the white frozen vapors are always in the stratosphere where cirrus clouds form and get a flight plan of commercial flights in your area and see if it matches observed trails.

This is not mockery, and so you are using loaded and false terms to describe my effort to get people to do their research. So far, the only responses have been: I don't have to. Chemtrails are real.

This kind of closed mind then often turns on me and calls me a paid shill (I would gladly take money for spreading science) or accuses me of disrespect. Those who disrespect you are those who lie to you, historians who pretend they know more than scientists, websites by total amateurs who feel entitled to say that all the scientist are wrong. I do not mock but feel sadness for such people, and that is why, out of respect, I urge them to do their own research.....but no one has taken me up on this.

I have: I watch the sky every day for the past 10 years. I have never (nor have you) seen trails below the cirrus cloud level, where they cannot be targeted and slightly warm the atmosphere, just as terrestrial pollution does. When I got my flight map, I saw the routes out of SF and San Jose, which fly right over my mountain home. In 100% of the cases, the flight patterrns, without exception, match the flight paths. So ujnless all the millions of commercial flights are spraying toxins, the trails observed are clearly explained.

Do you think all commerical flights are spraying toxins?

Why don't you do your own research, as I have, and come to your own conclusions instead of repeating claims by non-scientists?

I would take all the top banksters and lock them up. You are really confused. My logic is not the issue: the issue is, whom should a non-expert take seriously: a trained scientist with research in the field or a bunch of historians and amateur websites?

MY logic is to go to the experts who send their entires\ lives studying the atmosphere instead of those who are not qualified to reject their findings.

Quigley and Sutton may be good historians, and I do not doubt that proposals and experiments on weather modificaiton have taken place, but they do not explain the contrails that are formed in the stratosphere by jet engines.

And people on your side tell me: I know they are chemtrails, I can see them. We all see the white frozen vapors, but only a real scientist is qualified to say if they are "chemtrails." None do, tho many in other fields feel entitled to dismiss the real expets.

I urge you to do the research I have proposed: you have nothing to lose buy your chains. When people refuse to do their own research (so simple), I conclude they are afraid to find the truth and be exposed as gullible.

I