Meanwhile, it's those very outlets that could just as easily be accused of burying Donald Trump's sins. For instance, a presidential candidate facing accusations of raping a 13-year-old girl should be front page news, but has been largely ignored during this election. Trump actually has two upcoming court dates: one on November 28 for a Trump University class action lawsuit, another on December 16 for the aforementioned rape allegation. I could accuse "the media" of staying silent on such issues. As Paul Waldman of The Washington Post put it: "Trump's history of corruption is mind-boggling. So why is Clinton supposedly the corrupt one?"

Perhaps they fear losing press credentials the way The Washington Post did when Trump pulled their access for not giving him "favorable" coverage. Perhaps they fear lawsuits, something Trump has threatened various news organizations throughout his campaign, including The New York Times.

The truth is, the media isn't biased: we are. We as readers are seeing things we don't like and then accusing the sources of having partisan intentions, rather than giving a plain and fair look at the evidence in front of us.

And if the media still seems to have a liberal bias these days, it probably has more to do with Trump being a bad candidate than journalists not doing their job. Let us not forget that scores of stalwart conservative newspapers have endorsed Clinton this year: The Arizona Republic gave its first Democratic endorsement in 126 years. The Dallas Morning News gave its first Democratic endorsement in 75 years. The Cincinnati Inquirer broke a 100-year-long streak. The Houston Chronicle, who have only ever endorsed Democrats in the 2008 and 1964 elections, also endorsed Hillary Clinton. They are a few of many.