Detecting malware activity in encrypted traffic was thought to be an impossible task, but machine learning appears...

Sign in for existing members Continue Reading This Article Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more. Step 2 of 2: You forgot to provide an Email Address. This email address doesn’t appear to be valid. This email address is already registered. Please login. You have exceeded the maximum character limit. Please provide a Corporate E-mail Address.

I agree to TechTarget’s Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and the transfer of my information to the United States for processing to provide me with relevant information as described in our Privacy Policy. Please check the box if you want to proceed.

I agree to my information being processed by TechTarget and its Partners to contact me via phone, email, or other means regarding information relevant to my professional interests. I may unsubscribe at any time. Please check the box if you want to proceed.

By submitting my Email address I confirm that I have read and accepted the Terms of Use and Declaration of Consent.

to have led to a working technique.

Blake Anderson, a technical leader at Cisco, and David McGrew, a fellow in the company's advanced security research group, said it isn't possible to look into encrypted traffic. But the two developed a machine learning model that studied data features in "TLS [Transport Layer Security] handshake metadata, DNS [domain name system] contextual flows linked to the encrypted flow, and the HTTP headers of HTTP-contextual flows" in order to see the difference in how these encrypted traffic streams were used in malicious and benign scenarios.

According to an article posted by Cisco and written by Jason Deign, the technique is called Encrypted Traffic Analytics (ETA), and it "involves looking for telltale signs in three features of encrypted data."

"The first [telltale sign] is the initial data packet of the connection. This by itself may contain valuable data about the rest of the content. Then, there is the sequence of packet lengths and times, which offers vital clues into traffic contents beyond the beginning of the encrypted flow," Cisco wrote. "Finally, ETA checks the byte distribution across the payloads of the packets within the flow being analyzed. Since this network-based detection process is aided by machine learning, its efficacy improves over time."

Ajay Uggirala, director of product marketing at Imperva, based in Redwood Shores, Calif., worried about this method in practice because "there are several challenges with inspecting encrypted traffic."

"There are different types of encryption and standards, and network security needs to make sure they can decrypt all the types of encrypted traffic to see what is in it, not just some of the traffic. Inspecting encrypted traffic impacts network performance, causing latency to network traffic," Uggirala told SearchSecurity. "The network operations team's service-level agreements rely on maintaining high performance, and in most cases, the team would not deploy a security device that adds latency to network traffic."

Cisco did not respond to requests for comment, so it is unclear if this method adds latency to encrypted traffic.

Looking for malware activity in encrypted traffic without decryption is similar to being in a dark room looking for a black cat without a flashlight. Yes, you will see shadows, but I don't expect the accuracy of this method is sufficiently high. Nick Bilogorskiysenior director of threat operations at Cyphort

Nick Bilogorskiy, senior director of threat operations at Cyphort Inc., based in Santa Clara, Calif., and Mounir Hahad, senior director of the Cyphort Labs, said the success of Cisco's technique will depend on accuracy.

"Looking for malware activity in encrypted traffic without decryption is similar to being in a dark room looking for a black cat without a flashlight. Yes, you will see shadows, but I don't expect the accuracy of this method is sufficiently high," Bilogorskiy told SearchSecurity. "Supervised machine learning is a good tool to pick up anomalies, given clean voluminous data. But as attackers learn of this ETA detection method, they will likely try to modify their encrypted traffic to blend in and remove the features that machine learning models rely on for detection."

Hahad added, "It is interesting to note that this technique is not being introduced in Cisco's purpose-built security products like the ASA firewall or Advanced Malware Protection Threat Grid appliances, but rather in its switches and routers."

In their research abstract, Anderson and McGrew claimed "incorporating this contextual information into a supervised learning system significantly increases performance at a 0.00% false discovery rate for the problem of classifying encrypted, malicious flows."

Sam McLane, head of security engineering at Arctic Wolf Networks Inc., based in Sunnyvale, Calif., noted that even "an algorithm that results in zero false positives is going to have false negatives [and] threats that were missed. There is no silver bullet in security, and you cannot rely on just one detection method."