There are many things going on here. For one, there is the confirmation bias, feminists or white female feminists don't only single out Indian men. Outside of Quora, when I talk feminism with other feminists, Indian men never come up. I repeat Indian men almost never come up. However, when feminists from India and from the West, talk to about their experiences with feminism, and interactions on a site where there are more Indians visible, as well as Indian culture becoming a very strong factor in having a productive dialogue that involves cultural differences, I really think the behavior of Indian men is kind of guaranteed to be mentioned more often than not.



The thing is that if a feminist lenses was never directed towards current Indian culture, some Indian men wouldn't ever think about feminism. But the moment that feminism starts critiquing some part of Indian culture, suddenly that is what feminism is all about: attacking Indian men. Riiiiight.



The second thing about the bizarre phenomenon about White Female Feminists never expressly direct their criticism at "white men", is that for many people in the US, it has been ingrained in many people that white is the default. That is the basic cultural bias that many people in the US are currently fighting, but those are the facts.



Actually there are whole waves of feminism that hinge on objectives that aim to create equality for the issues of middle class white women, while at the time never singling out that those were the issues of white women. Instead they used verbiage that indicated that the plight of middle class white women were the plight of all women at the time. Slight oversight.



Now we know what people are thinking of when they say some "general" phrases they really mean a very specific group. When some non-Americans say "American women" they mean "white American women". Because they are also working under a very similar unconscious bias that "American" means "white". When they say "American women" they don't mean "black American women" because if they wanted to include them they would just say "black women". They don't say "Latin American women" they would say something like "Hispanic women" or "Latin women".



The ingrained default mindset that many people are taught, white or not, is that American means white. For a similar reason, if you are in your home country, and you are of the ethnic majority, what reason would you have to expressly point out the ethnic affiliation of someone else unless that ethnic affiliation is different from the majority? Like in Italy, when a woman complains about her bad luck dating men, she doesn't mean all men who walk the earth, she is talking about Italian men, but in the context she is speaking there is no need to specify the ethnic or the nationality of the group she is speaking about.



So basically, white women don't need to say "white men" to talk or criticize white men; they just say "men". Because it is ingrained in people that the default person is "white".



Also, you have apparently never seen feminist discussions in a space that acknowledges intersectionality because there are many criticisms towards white heterosexual/homosexual cis-gendered men's attitudes, behavior and privilege ALL. OF. THE. TIME. But like I indicated at the beginning of this answer, none of that would pop-up as feminism for some Indian guys giving a cursory look at feminism, because what catches their attention is when they are mentioned, not when feminism actually talks about things that doesn't involve them.