It's all a mystery, but there are a few folks who actually have the answer.

I have been amazed (but not surprised) by the reaction of some diehard Clinton partisans folks here to Donna Brazile’s charge about what happened at the DNC in the run-up to the 2016 presidential primary:

Amazed at the convoluted, labyrinthine tweetstorm explanations for how Brazile got it all wrong offered by numerous on-record and off-record sources.

Amazed at the level of personal attacks and vitriol leveled at Brazile.

Amazed at the conspiracy theories being offered by a few folks about why Brazile has brought this charge forward.

Amazed at the excuses made for why Clinton hasn’t responded or won’t/shouldn’t respond to Brazile’s claim.

Amazed at the attacks on Sanders as if Brazile’s charge is somehow the fault of Sanders who had nothing to do with it.

Amazed that none of these diehard Clinton partisans folks want to suggest the simplest answer to Brazile’s charge: Have Clinton, Mook, John Podesta, Debbie Wasserman Schultz or some other higher-up in the Clinton campaign debunk what Brazile has claimed.

Pretty easy, isn’t it? If what Brazile has charged is wrong, it should be easy for any of the aforementioned people to debunk Brazile’s claim, right? Or, even easier, produce a copy of the original agreement. Someone from the Clinton camp must have a copy, right?

Let’s face it, if Brazile is lying, her career in politics is over.

I expect the comments section to quickly fill with excuses and brickbats.