This post is about the Symbol() , supplied with actual examples I could find/make and facts & definitions I could find.

TLDR;

The Symbol() is the data type, introduced with the release of ECMAScript 6 (ES6).

There're two curious facts about the Symbol.

the first data type and only data type in JavaScript which has got no literal

any variable, defined with Symbol() , gets unique content, but it's not really private.

any data has its own Symbol, and for the same data the Symbols would be the same. More info in the following paragraph, otherwise it's not a TLRD; :)

How do I initialise the symbol?

1. To get a unique identifier with a debuggable value

You can do it either this way:

var mySymbol1 = Symbol();

Or this way:

var mySymbol2 = Symbol("some text here");

The "some text here" string can't be extracted from the symbol, it's just a description for debugging purposes. It doesn't change the behaviour of symbol in any way. Although, you could console.log it (which is fair, since the value is for debugging, so as not to mistake that log with some other log entry):

console.log(mySymbol2); // Symbol(some text here)

2. To obtain a symbol for some string data

In this case the value of symbol is actually taken into account and this way two symbols may be non-unique.

var a1 = Symbol.for("test"); var a2 = Symbol.for("test"); console.log(a1 == a2); //true!

Let's call those symbols "second-type" symbols. They do not intersect with the "first-type" symbols (i.e. the ones defined with Symbol(data) ) in any way.

The next two paragraphs pertain only the the first-type symbol.

How do I benefit from using Symbol instead of the older data types?

Let's first consider an object, a standard data type. We could define some key-values pairs there and have an access to the values by specifying the key.

var persons = {"peter":"pan","jon":"doe"}; console.log(persons.peter); // pan

What if we have two persons with the name Peter?

Doing this:

var persons = {"peter":"first", "peter":"pan"};

wouldn't make much sense.

So, appears to be a problem of two absolutely different persons having a same name. Let's then refer out new Symbol() . It's like a person in real life - any person is unique, but their names can be equal. Let's define two "persons".

var a = Symbol("peter"); var b = Symbol("peter");

Now we have got two different persons with the same name. Are our persons different indeed? They are; you can check this:

console.log(a == b); // false

How do we benefit there?

We can make two entries in your object for the different persons and they can't be mistaken in any way.

var firstPerson = Symbol("peter"); var secondPerson = Symbol("peter"); var persons = {[firstPerson]:"first", [secondPerson]:"pan"};

Note:

It's worth to notice, though, that stringifying the object with JSON.stringify will drop all the pairs initialised with a Symbol as a key.

Executing Object.keys won't either return such Symbol()->value pairs.

Using this initialisation, it's absolutely impossible to mistake the entries for the first and second persons. Calling console.log for them will correctly output their second names.

console.log(persons[a]); // first console.log(persons[b]); // pan

When used in object, how it is different compared to defining non-enumerable property?

Indeed, there already existed a way to define a property to be hidden from Object.keys and enumeration. Here it is:

var anObject = {}; var fruit = "apple"; Object.defineProperty( anObject, fruit, { enumerable: false, value: "green" });

What difference does Symbol() bring there? The difference is that you can still get the property defined with Object.defineProperty in the usual way:

console.log(anObject[fruit]); //green console.log(anObject["apple"]); //green console.log(anObject.apple); //green

And if defined with Symbol as in previous paragraph:

fruit = Symbol("apple");

You will have an ability to receive its value only if knowing its variable, i.e.

console.log(anObject[fruit]); //green console.log(anObject["apple"]); //undefined console.log(anObject.apple); //undefined

Moreover, defining another property under the key "apple" will make the object drop the older one (and if hard-coded, it could throw an error). So, no more apples! That's a pity. Referring the previous paragraph, the Symbols are unique and defining a key as Symbol() will make it unique.

Type conversion and checking