The canonization of John McCain has begun. In his Monday New York Times

column, William Kristol suggested that McCain isn't simply a candidate for

president. He's something more-the next Winston Churchill who can lead the

U.S. to victory in the war on terror. According to Kristol, who has long

been a close friend of McCain's and quoted him reciting a turgid Victorian

poem, he is a "not-so-modern type. One might call him a neo-Victorian -

rigid, self-righteous and moralizing, but (or rather and) manly, courageous

and principled." For both Kristol and David Brooks, McCain epitomizes the

belief in American national greatness that can replicate the glories of the

nineteenth century British empire. In reality, their anachronistic

exaltation of warfare as the highest test of manly courage may end up

ruining the U.S., much as it did the British empire.

The neoconservative obsession with the Victorian era is longstanding-and

most revealing. It dates back to Kristol's own mother, Gertrude Himmelfarb,

a prominent historian who has long sought to rehabilitate the often-scorned

Victorians. In a series of books, including a new collection of essays just

released by Yale titled The Spirit of the Age, she has mythologized the

Victorians for shunning welfare and relying on thrift and self-initiative to

create a benevolent empire. Himmelfarb and other neoconservatives such as

Midge Decter believe that the rise of post-Victorian mores, including

homosexuality and feminism, have weakened the manly virtues that are

necessary for defending the homeland.

The neoconservatives, who believe, or pretend to believe, that supposed foes

abroad always represent new Hitlers and that wimpy liberals are about to

recapitulate the appeasement that English liberals espoused in the 1930s,

are constantly searching for a new Churchill. They see Churchill as the last

great representative of the Victorian era in contrast to the weaklings that

surrounded him. (George W. Bush himself keeps a bust of Churchill in the

Oval Office.) For the neocons, McCain, a military hero who has written a

number of books and become a politician, eerily resembles Churchill himself.

McCain himself has made his admiration for Churchill abundantly apparent in

his most recent book, Hard Call, in which he hails the great man's

prescience in warning of Germany's aggressive intentions in the run-up to

both World War I and World War II. But more to the point, McCain represents

for the neocons the ultimate synthesis of war hero and politician. And

McCain, in turn, has been increasingly drawn to the neocons' militaristic

vision of the U.S. as an empire that can set wrong aright around the globe.

The neocons became close to McCain in the 1990s, when they supported

American intervention in the Balkans. According to the New Republic's John

Judis, the first sign of neocon influence on McCain came in 1999. McCain

delivered a speech at Kansas State University in which he touted "national

greatness conservatism," arguing: "The United States is the indispensable

nation because we have proven to be the greatest force for good in human

history." He went on to state that the U.S. should have "every intention of

continuing to use our primacy in world affairs for humanity's benefit."

Since then, McCain has, of course, become the most prominent advocate of

ramping up the U.S. effort in Iraq, not to mention Sudan and a variety of

other hotspots. If McCain becomes president, the neocons will be in charge.

It's no small irony that they may well end up destroying the very American

empire they seek to expand, just as the British empire collapsed during the

past century.