Inside the NFC East, the Giants had 30, the Redskins 29, the Eagles 27. All three of those teams have really needed to rely on other teams' players and have either been involved in a massive roster overhaul recently (Eagles, Redskins) with new people switching the direction of the build or a massive cash outlay in free agency (Giants) to try to sort out some problems of equal size.

The Cowboys are now among the very best at home-grown talent. This simply means players they have discovered. These are players who have never played elsewhere (strictly defined as having never played a game in another uniform). They now successfully draft and/or sign out of college the majority of their own players. According to our research from last season, the Cowboys trailed only the Green Bay Packers in this category (49), among all of the teams in the NFL that we surveyed. The Cowboys had 43 homegrown players on their 53-man roster last year, which compares quite favorably to many of the key teams on your radar.

Allow me to now pay them some compliments in what might be a far more important component in how they do business. This ties into a wonderful, clear and new trend that has been found during the Jason Garrett tenure as head coach.

We have spent some time over the years noticing trends in the way the Dallas Cowboys have run their organization. Earlier in the week we discussed the perils of their personal conduct policies and tolerance and that has been discussed at great length.

Some of the notable names around the league also fall well short of the Cowboys current trend: Seattle was at 39 last season. Atlanta 31, New England 38, and Pittsburgh came in at 36. Now, obviously, it should be pointed out that there is no magic to this formula. A team with 31 can still go to the Super Bowl and you can, of course, build a very powerful team while not subscribing to this strategy.

But, I have tracked this trend over the years and there are two benefits to being on the list of teams that are in the top 10 on this list year after year.

1) The list of teams that have the most homegrown players on their roster seems to correlate in a larger sample to long-term winning. Every time we assemble this list, we see that the teams who consistently win are also the teams that do not resort to free agency or the waiver wire to fill gaps in their squad. It happens to everyone, but those who rely on it do not win consistently. New England, Pittsburgh, Green Bay and Seattle are the four teams that annually are the most "home-grown" since I started charting this in 2009 and they also have been in the playoffs regularly.

2) The list of teams who draft and sign their own talent out of college then have a magnificent advantage of extending those players to team-friendly contracts can help you manage your salary cap and your expenditures to keep your team together for years to come. There are limitations - Seattle has found that out the hard way as they have signed too many players to "top of the charts" deals and have not had enough money elsewhere to fill all holes. But if you do this right, you can keep your core well past their 30th birthdays and not have to panic-buy in free agency to fix problems very often.

That is something worth looking at today with news this week that the Cowboys have signed La'el Collins to a 2-year extension that will average $7.7M a year for a guy who had a very impressive first season and then missed much of 2016 to injury and fell out of the mix.

But, with the exits of Ron Leary (4 years/$36M to Denver including a slightly bigger guarantee than Travis Frederick received) and Doug Free, the Cowboys realize that Collins is exactly as important as they thought he might be when they secured his services on draft week in 2015.

Collins is a tremendous talent and one I thought was among the very best players in that draft - a sure first-rounder. Through a series of events that no doubt rocked his world, he went from that status to undrafted with a bizarre link to a murder case right before the draft. Once he was cleared of that connection, he was free to make his living in pro football, but the damage financially was done.

I had him as my best 2015 OL draft prospect - ahead of Brandon Scherff (Redskins) and Ereck Flowers (Giants) who both went in the top 10. I submit he may have gone before one or both of them, but that is academic now.

Scherff received a 4-year/$21M rookie deal and Flowers received 4-year/$14.4M while Collins ended up with three years for $1.5M. Collins lost a ton of money as you can see, but this recent extension will bring his five-year earnings to about $17M. Scherff will get about $35M and Flowers will be at roughly $26-$27M. So while Collins is back in the mix, I suspect the intent was to get him close to the Byron Jones number which, after they pick up his fifth-year option is going to be roughly five years, $17-$18M.