377 SHARES

One big point of difference among state economies is the tax burden of the average citizen. This number varies greatly. But what are the reasons behind why some states tax their residents more or less?

If a state can afford not to tax its residents at high rates, there are multiple explanations. One is that their economic policies are sound and the state economy is doing well. But another is that the state gets disproportionately more funding from the federal government than states with harsher tax codes.

Americans have looked at federal assistance programs with growing scrutiny. According to a 2018 Rasmussen report, 61% of American adults think there are too many people receiving government financial aid. On the other hand, only 9% think not enough people are receiving funds. Regardless of overall trends, though, it is true that some states receive a far higher return on their federal income-tax contributions than others.

Just how big is this difference? And to what extent does it change our perception of state and local tax rates around the country? WalletHub sought to answer those questions by comparing the 50 states in terms of three key metrics. Read on for our findings, commentary from a panel of experts, and a detailed explanation of our methodology.

Main Findings

Most Federally Dependent States

Rank

(1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 New Mexico 83.22 3 5 2 Kentucky 78.96 5 4 3 Mississippi 75.84 8 2 4 Alabama 71.86 4 13 5 West Virginia 67.83 6 16 6 South Carolina 67.81 2 29 7 Arizona 67.22 11 3 8 Alaska 64.16 9 10 9 Montana 63.80 15 6 10 Louisiana 58.91 34 1 11 Indiana 58.89 7 22 12 Oregon 54.35 25 7 13 Tennessee 54.30 21 8 14 Maine 53.70 14 18 15 Vermont 50.96 18 15 16 Missouri 49.23 31 9 17 Maryland 47.82 12 33 18 South Dakota 47.22 23 14 19 Wyoming 44.95 22 20 20 Oklahoma 44.75 19 26 21 Idaho 44.49 20 27 22 Arkansas 44.06 39 11 23 Pennsylvania 42.78 17 34 24 Georgia 42.57 32 17 25 Michigan 42.15 30 19 26 North Dakota 40.90 1 50 27 Ohio 40.56 47 12 28 Florida 39.79 26 25 29 Iowa 37.99 29 28 30 Texas 37.81 42 21 31 Rhode Island 37.75 38 24 32 Wisconsin 36.98 16 41 33 Washington 36.33 27 32 34 North Carolina 36.03 36 30 35 New Hampshire 35.57 37 31 36 New York 35.25 44 23 37 Nevada 34.17 33 36 38 Hawaii 33.65 10 48 39 California 31.44 43 35 40 Nebraska 28.09 46 37 41 Virginia 27.99 13 49 42 Connecticut 27.78 24 45 43 Utah 27.06 28 44 44 Colorado 26.55 35 43 45 Minnesota 25.28 40 42 46 Massachusetts 24.34 45 39 47 New Jersey 23.35 49 38 48 Illinois 22.53 48 40 49 Kansas 18.57 41 47 50 Delaware 14.97 50 46





Red vs. Blue States

Correlation Analysis

Ask The Experts: Making Sense of Funding Disparities

For further clarity on the problems contributing to federal-funding disparities, we talked to a panel of economics and public policy experts. Click on the experts’ profiles to read their bios and responses to the following key questions:

Should Federal resources be allocated to states according to how much they pay in federal taxes or should some states subsidize others? What programs should be a state/local responsibility and what should be a federal responsibility? What is the fairest way to redistribute federal resources back to the states? Will the new tax code have a positive effect on the economy?

Methodology

In order to determine the most and least federally dependent states, WalletHub compared the 50 states across two key dimensions, “State Residents’ Dependency” and “State Government’s Dependency.”

We evaluated those dimensions using three relevant metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the highest level of federal dependency.

We then determined each state’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its total score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample.

State Residents’ Dependency – Total Points: 50

Return on Taxes Paid to the Federal Government: Triple Weight (~37.50 Points)

Note: This metric was calculated by dividing federal funding in U.S. dollars by IRS collections in U.S. dollars.

Share of Federal Jobs: Full Weight (~12.50 Points)

State Government’s Dependency – Total Points: 50

Federal Funding as a Share of State Revenue: Full Weight (~50.00 Points)

Note: This metric reflects the proportion of state revenue that comes from the federal government in the form of intergovernmental aid.

The following metrics were included in the infographic above for context only. They represent subsets of federal funding and are reflected in the first two metrics.

“Federal Contracts” divided by “IRS Collections”

“Grants” divided by “IRS Collections”

“Other Financial Assistance” divided by “IRS Collections”

Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Census Bureau, USAspending.gov, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Governing.com. Unless noted otherwise, the statistics underlying this report are from 2015 and 2016.

Was this article helpful? Yes No Awesome! Thanks for your feedback. Thank you for your feedback. Sorry! Failed to send the feedback. Please try again later. Submit

Disclaimer: Editorial and user-generated content is not provided or commissioned by financial institutions. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and have not been approved or otherwise endorsed by any financial institution, including those that are WalletHub advertising partners. Our content is intended for informational purposes only, and we encourage everyone to respect our content guidelines. Please keep in mind that it is not a financial institution’s responsibility to ensure all posts and questions are answered. Ad Disclosure: Certain offers that appear on this site originate from paying advertisers, and this will be noted on an offer’s details page using the designation "Sponsored", where applicable. Advertising may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). At WalletHub we try to present a wide array of offers, but our offers do not represent all financial services companies or products.