This is a valid concern. I will first say that we don't know what kind of accountability is taking place behind the scenes. The only way we would know Stillman's thoughts on Armstrong's performance is whether he spoke on the topic, and what's he supposed to say in that situation, or if he fired him. I don't think that's going to happen. But there have to be questions. We can all play armchair GM and it's not always fair. But over the past couple of years, the Blues have traded Oshie for Brouwer and lost Brouwer. They've let David Backes leave via free agency, a decision that some would agree with, but a decision that will hurt the club this season. The Vladimir Sobotka saga was very troublesome, tying up cap space, etc. There were some who wondered whether it was the right thing to bring Hitchcock back, even though he deserved it after last year's success. But it led to the loss of two qualified assistant coaches and an unprecedented 'coach in waiting' scenario that could soon lead to some awkwardness. So I think there are enough questions to have be concerned. A lot of these decisions were made in the best interest of the future of the organization. But you have to capitalize on last year's run to the conference finals. This franchise was at a point in time where it had to build, and I don't know that the team currently assembled, including the fact that they're attempting to play somewhat of a different style, was the best way to build on that success. Again, it may be best for the club in the long term, but it doesn't help now, which is a critical point in time gaining fans and growing the organization.